What Does from Time to Time Mean in Legal Terms

What`s left? Cases where one party is granted the right to take a particular measure and there is nothing in the wording to prevent the other party from arguing that it is a single right. Without the consent of the bondholders, the issuer may, from time to time, issue and issue on one or more occasions additional bonds under conditions identical to those of the bonds already issued (with the exception of the date of issue and the first payment of interest on them). Each Party shall perform and deliver all instruments and take all measures reasonably required by the other Party from time to time to comply with the terms of this Agreement. But in such contexts, I would not use from time to time. It means “from time to time.” A party may exercise its right occasionally, but it may just as well exercise it, for example twice in a row. Instead, I would use one or more times: the recommended terms to describe this period are “as soon as possible” and “as soon as circumstances permit.” “As soon as possible” is also an alternative, but keep in mind that it is a term that is rarely used outside of legal texts. Without the suffix from time to time, the client can only request this certificate once. The phrase allows the customer to request the certificate as often as they want. A second use from time to time is intended to clarify that such purpose may change after the entry into force of the Agreement: the Bank may, from time to time, on one or more occasions, adjust the imprest rate in the light of changes in its collection experience with respect to accounts or other factors related to accounts or other guarantees. From time to time also occurs in restrictive covenants that modify a noun phrase. (They are a fertile source of redundancy: see MSCD 3.58 and 3.114.) By the way, note that authors can use at any time to convey the same meaning as from time to time. Click here to see Troy reader`s comment on this. But at any time, there is certainly no improvement from time to time.

There is a problem with the use of the phrase “as soon as something happens,” that is, a person.B must do something “as soon as he becomes aware of a factual situation.” This expression is usually meant to mean that the thing must be done immediately after something else has happened. The problem with this approach is that it literally requires the thing to be done at the moment the condition in the sentence is met. The problem can be avoided by inserting an “after” and using one of the recommended terms for this category. In other words, a person must do something “immediately after becoming aware of a factual situation.” However, it may happen that adding “immediately after” can increase the complexity of the sentence to an undesirable level. In these cases, the use of “as soon as possible” would be acceptable. The only time the use of this term is appropriate is when the customer wants a request that the thing needs to be done, but not necessarily early, and wants to provide a generous timeline for compliance. Third, the use of the word any without recourse may, from time to time, make it clear that a party may exercise a particular right on more than one occasion. For example, the agent may make any advance to the borrower on behalf of the lenders that the agent deems necessary or desirable to obtain or protect the security.

The examples provide aspects that may affect the object that is changed from time to time by the sentence, outside the immediate scope of the provision. How and when the chair is appointed should be treated elsewhere; It is clear who is being referred to. Although a change in the technical amendment procedure may affect the possibility of amending the tender specifications (or even making such a change illusory), such a change does not fall within the scope of that amending provision. That`s because restrictive covenants are used to refer to a real state of affairs, and all that goes beyond that is excess baggage that should be deposited or handled elsewhere. 1. Shortest time: In this category, what needs to be done must be done before anything else. To meet a requirement that sets this period, it is necessary to stop the ongoing activities to do the thing. No delay in the execution of the required element is allowed. Fellows under the Plan will be the directors, officers and other employees of the Company as the Committee chooses from time to time. The term is used from time to time to essentially mean “on one or more occasions”. It is only used with discretionary language, as it would make no sense to force someone to do something on one or more occasions.

“quickly”: although this word has a generally accepted legal meaning corresponding to the second category of periods, its use is discouraged because it is not a simple language and its legal meaning may not coincide with the meaning understood by the public. On the basis of an examination of general and legal dictionaries and case law, it is very difficult to argue that a particular expression that does not use certain units of time has an exact meaning that should be used in a particular situation to the exclusion of other expressions. For example, legal dictionaries tend to treat “without delay” and “immediately” as having the same meaning. Another factor that adds to the confusion is the use of variations in expressions that may convey the same meaning. For example, there are the terms often used “as soon as possible”, while “as soon as possible” and “as soon as reasonably possible in the circumstances” have been used. If the Supplier wishes to change the Service Description, it will from time to time inform the Customer of any proposed changes in accordance with the Customer`s Technical Modification Procedure (CE). In this November 2007 post, I suggested that the phrase is still irrelevant at all times. Well, the same goes from time to time. The idea is that, from time to time, it serves to make it clear, with respect to a particular right, that a party is not limited to exercising that right only once. The Chair may from time to time address the Chair of the Non-Executive Board. If the intention is for something to be done quickly, given the circumstances, the phrase “within a reasonable time” should not be used, as it does not give the idea that the matter should be resolved expeditiously. Instead, the terms recommended for the second category of periods should be used.

A representative of the borrower may, from time to time, on one or more occasions, provide the agent with a notice of borrowing or a notice of continuance or conversion. 3. Duty to do something “within a reasonable time”: Usually, this term is used when there is no need for the matter to be resolved promptly – instead, a reasonable amount of time is acceptable. What is reasonable is determined by the circumstances and the nature of the thing to be done. Despite this meaning, the expression is used slightly differently from time to time and in different contexts. First of all, it is specified that an action is required or authorized more than once: but sometimes, given the context, it is so clear that the right is not a single right that you do not have to say it explicitly: in this article, “periods” refers to the words used in laws or regulations to describe the limited time, inside which something needs to be done. Federal legislation uses a variety of terms to describe it: “as soon as possible”, “as soon as possible”, “as soon as possible”, “as soon as possible”, “immediately”, “within five days”, etc.